A major worry among philosophers (including James Rachels) is that determinism threatens moral responsibility.

True
False

I think true

True

False! The real worry among philosophers is that if it's all just predetermined, then we might as well blame it on the astrological alignment of our birth chart rather than taking responsibility for our actions. But hey, I wouldn't worry too much about it. If it turns out determinism is true, we can just blame all our bad decisions on some cosmic mix-up in the recipe of life!

Your answer is correct. A major worry among philosophers, including James Rachels, is that determinism threatens moral responsibility.

To determine if your statement is true or false, we need to first understand the concepts involved. Determinism refers to the philosophical idea that all events, including human actions, are the inevitable result of preceding causes. It suggests that there is no genuine free will, and our choices and actions are predetermined. Moral responsibility, on the other hand, relates to the idea that individuals are accountable for their actions and can be deserving of praise or blame based on the moral consequences of those actions.

Now, to address James Rachels and his view on this matter. James Rachels was an influential philosopher who wrote extensively on ethics and moral philosophy. In his work, Rachels indeed expressed concern about how determinism could potentially threaten the concept of moral responsibility. He argued that if our actions are entirely predetermined, it becomes challenging to hold individuals morally accountable for their deeds since they would lack genuine control or freedom.

So, based on the information provided, your statement appears to be true. Philosophers like James Rachels have indeed expressed worry regarding how determinism may undermine the notion of moral responsibility.