Why does the Constitution describe the executive and legislative branches in more detail than the
judicial branch?
knlkn:KN
The Constitution describes the executive and legislative branches in more detail than the judicial branch due to the framers' intent and the nature of each branch's powers and functions.
The framers of the Constitution wanted to establish a government with a strong executive branch, led by the President, and a representative legislative branch, consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate. These branches were seen as crucial for enacting and implementing laws, shaping policies, and representing the interests of the citizens. Therefore, the Constitution provides more extensive detail on the structure, powers, and responsibilities of these branches.
On the other hand, the judicial branch, headed by the Supreme Court, was designed to interpret laws and apply constitutional principles to specific cases. The framers recognized the importance of an impartial judiciary, independent of political influence, and sought to avoid potential interference with the judicial process. Consequently, the Constitution provides a relatively limited amount of description regarding the organization and functioning of the judicial branch.
It is worth noting that although the Constitution provides fewer details about the judicial branch, it does establish the powers and jurisdiction of the federal judiciary, sets the size of the Supreme Court, and grants Congress the authority to create lower federal courts. The details of the judicial branch's procedures, internal organization, and practices have been further developed through legislation, court decisions, and the common law system. Overall, the framing of the Constitution reflects the framers' emphasis on balancing power among the three branches, with some variation in the level of detail provided for each.