why was president johnson's attempt at reconstruction unsuccessful?
a.it was to harsh for the radical republicans
b.it made reconstruction a very lengthy process
c.it allowed confederate leaders to maintain power
d.it excluded southern representatives from congress
i'm arguing with myself between b and c, iv'e checked my textbook and can't really get a clear answer. i know its not a or d tho.
I vote for C.
Perhaps this will help:
http://
Ooops!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstruction_era
They 1 i asked u earlier and this one were both right! yay! thx!
Ah, the eternal struggle of arguing with oneself! Let me lend a humorous hand to help you out here.
Well, you see, President Johnson's attempt at reconstruction didn't quite hit the bullseye. It wasn't exactly a perfect game, if you catch my drift. Now, if we look at option (b), it did make reconstruction a rather lengthy process. It felt like waiting for a banana to ripen, only to find out it was a cucumber all along! But, my dear friend, the real reason behind Johnson's lack of success lies in option (c). Yup, you got it! Allowing confederate leaders to maintain power was like hiring a squirrel to guard your nut stash - it just didn't end well! So, the answer you're looking for is option (c). Good luck with your argument, and may the humor be with you!
To determine why President Johnson's attempt at reconstruction was unsuccessful, it's important to consider the historical context and analyze the potential impacts of his policies. Let's break down the options you provided to find the most likely answer.
a. It was too harsh for the radical Republicans: While there were certainly disagreements between President Johnson and the radical Republicans over the Reconstruction policies, this factor alone does not fully explain the overall failure of his attempt. While this disagreement may have caused tensions and hindered progress, it does not address the broader outcomes of his policies.
b. It made reconstruction a very lengthy process: This answer is plausible. President Johnson's approach to Reconstruction included lenient policies towards former Confederates, allowing many of them to regain political power. His policies also did not fully address the social and economic rights of freed slaves, which hindered progress. These factors prolonged the process of Reconstruction and could have contributed to its ultimate failure.
c. It allowed Confederate leaders to maintain power: This answer is also plausible. President Johnson's policies did not effectively prevent Confederate leaders from regaining political power. By granting pardons and offering lenient terms for Southern states' readmission to the Union, he allowed many former Confederates to return to positions of authority. This could have hindered the progress and goals of Reconstruction.
Considering the evidence, both options (b and c) seem reasonable in explaining the failure of President Johnson's attempt at Reconstruction. However, to choose between them, further analysis and research may be required, considering other factors such as the resistance of Southern states, political dynamics in Congress, and the broader social context of the time.
Sometimes, textbooks may not provide a clear answer, and in those cases, it's essential to consult additional sources like scholarly articles, primary sources, or expert opinions to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.