Each of the following cases addresses a contemporary issue of federalism EXCEPT:
A.
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.
B.
Altria Group v. Good.
C.
Wyeth v. Levine.
D.
Lawrence v. Texas.
Is it D?
Correct.
To determine which one of the options does not address a contemporary issue of federalism, we first need to understand what federalism is. Federalism refers to the division of power between the federal government and the state governments.
Option D is Lawrence v. Texas, which was a landmark Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of privacy and the constitutionality of sodomy laws. While this case is an important one, it does not directly address a contemporary issue of federalism.
To confirm our answer, we can briefly review the other options:
Option A is Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., which is a case that deals with the issue of federal preemption. It focused on the question of whether a state law can provide an additional or different standard of care when it comes to medical devices that have received pre-market approval from the FDA. This case directly addresses a contemporary issue of federalism.
Option B is Altria Group v. Good, which also deals with federal preemption. The case involved a dispute over whether federal law preempts state law in regulating deceptive advertising practices for cigarette labeling and marketing. This case directly addresses a contemporary issue of federalism.
Option C is Wyeth v. Levine, which is another case related to federal preemption. It examined whether a state law failure-to-warn claim is preempted by federal regulation of prescription drugs. This case also directly addresses a contemporary issue of federalism.
Therefore, the correct answer is D. Lawrence v. Texas, as it does not address a contemporary issue of federalism.