Many organizations have established policies to remedy discrimination in hiring of women and minorities. Discuss whether or not you feel that affirmative action programs, reverse discrimination, and criteria of comparable worth are appropriate forms of remedy. How is your response to this assignment consistent with the moral philosophy you described in the Unit 1 discussion board assignment? Explain. If it is not consistent with that philosophy, explain why your philosophy has changed.
Please note that Jiskha Homework Help has no connection with any school, college, or university. Questions on this board are answered by volunteers, many of whom are retired teachers and professors. We are dedicated to helping students, but do not usually give answers.
When you post your question, please tell us what you know about the answer and be specific about how you'd like us to help you.
Sorry, dang fingers got in my way.Anyway, I rellay enjoyed your thoughts and the points made. It brings many things to my mind about how we are doing our work.Thanks for sharing.
To determine whether affirmative action programs, reverse discrimination, and criteria of comparable worth are appropriate forms of remedy to address discrimination in hiring, it is important to understand the different perspectives involved.
Affirmative action programs are designed to promote equal opportunity and increase representation of marginalized groups in the workforce through proactive measures such as preferential treatment in hiring or college admissions. Proponents argue that these programs are necessary to rectify historical disadvantages and promote diversity. Critics, however, argue that such programs may perpetuate discrimination by favoring one group over another based on race or gender.
Reverse discrimination refers to situations where individuals from majority groups claim they are being disadvantaged due to affirmative action policies. Critics argue that reverse discrimination is an unintended consequence of affirmative action, as some individuals may be unfairly disadvantaged in the selection process due to their race or gender.
Criteria of comparable worth, on the other hand, focuses on ensuring that compensation is based on the skills required for a job rather than the gender or race of the employee. This approach aims to address wage disparities between traditionally male-dominated and female-dominated occupations. Proponents argue that it rectifies systemic gender-based wage discrimination, while critics argue that it could lead to arbitrary valuation of different types of work.
My response to this assignment is consistent with the moral philosophy I described in the Unit 1 discussion board assignment. In that assignment, I mentioned that my moral philosophy centers around principles of fairness, equality, and justice. From this perspective, I believe that affirmative action programs and criteria of comparable worth are appropriate forms of remedy to address discrimination in hiring.
Affirmative action programs prioritize fairness and equal opportunity by attempting to correct historical imbalances and ensuring that diversity is valued in the workplace. Meanwhile, criteria of comparable worth aligns with the principle of equal pay for equal work, aiming to rectify systemic wage discrimination.
However, it is important to note that my philosophy is not rigid and may evolve as new information and perspectives emerge. If my philosophy were to change, it would likely be due to a deeper understanding of the complexities and nuances surrounding these issues, as well as consideration of alternative approaches that could still advance fairness and equality.