Hume would agree with which statement about ethics? (Points : 1)
There is a direct connection between the way that things are and the way they ought to be.
Just because certain things are, does not mean that is the way they ought to be.
One can use statements about the way things are to justify the way things ought to be.
The way that things ought to be is the way that they are.
none of the above
Just because certain things are, does not mean that is the way they ought to be.
I agree,
So do I.
Hume would agree with the statement: Just because certain things are, does not mean that is the way they ought to be.
To understand why Hume would agree with this statement, we need to look at his ethical philosophy. Hume was an influential philosopher who argued for a form of moral subjectivism. He believed that moral judgments are based on our sentiments or emotions rather than objective truths.
According to Hume, there is a distinction between "is" statements and "ought" statements. "Is" statements describe the way things are, while "ought" statements express how things should be. Hume argued that it is fallacious to derive an "ought" statement directly from an "is" statement. In other words, just because something is the case does not mean it ought to be that way.
Hume believed that moral judgments are ultimately based on our passions and emotions. He argued that moral reasoning is grounded in our sentiments, feelings, and intuitions, rather than in objective facts about the world. Therefore, he would reject the idea that there is a direct connection between the way things are and the way they ought to be.
In summary, Hume would agree with the statement that just because certain things are, does not mean that is the way they ought to be because he argued for a distinction between descriptive "is" statements and prescriptive "ought" statements, and believed that moral judgments are based on our emotions and sentiments rather than objective truths.