How was the presidencies of Harding and Coolidge different
http://www.www.whitehouse.gov/1600/presidents/warrenharding
http://www.www.whitehouse.gov/1600/presidents/calvincoolidge
The biggest difference is that Harding's administration was very corrupt, while Coolidge's was not. Otherwise, their policies were much the same, laissez faire.
The comedian Will Rogers said of Coolidge: "He done nothing, but he done it well."
The presidencies of Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge were indeed different in several ways. To understand these differences, let's look at some key aspects of each presidency:
1. Leadership Style:
Warren G. Harding: Harding adopted a more hands-off approach to governance, often delegating responsibilities to his Cabinet members. He focused on unity and reducing regulation, believing that a restrained government would lead to economic growth.
Calvin Coolidge: Coolidge was known for his strong leadership and commitment to fiscal conservatism. He believed in limited government intervention and advocated for reduced federal spending, lower taxes, and a balanced budget.
2. Economic Policies:
Warren G. Harding: Harding pursued pro-business policies, supporting a return to normalcy after World War I. He focused on promoting economic growth and a laissez-faire approach to regulation. Harding's administration implemented tax cuts and favored policies that would benefit business interests.
Calvin Coolidge: Coolidge continued and expanded upon Harding's economic policies. He believed in free-market capitalism and advocated for reduced government intervention in the economy. Coolidge championed tax cuts and pursued policies that fostered business growth and investment.
3. Scandals and Integrity:
Warren G. Harding: The Harding administration was marred by numerous scandals, most notably the Teapot Dome scandal, which involved the corrupt leasing of federal oil reserves. These scandals tarnished Harding's legacy and called into question the integrity of his presidency.
Calvin Coolidge: Coolidge, on the other hand, was known for his personal integrity and probity. He distanced himself from the scandals of the Harding era and emphasized the importance of ethical conduct in public office. Coolidge's reputation for honesty and integrity was a marked departure from his predecessor.
In conclusion, the presidencies of Harding and Coolidge differed in terms of leadership style, economic policies, and personal integrity. While Harding pursued a more hands-off approach and faced significant scandals, Coolidge embraced fiscal conservatism and was known for his personal integrity. These contrasting approaches to governance shaped their respective legacies in American history.