Which of the following activities is not designed for teaching parts and wholes?
A. Magnetic numerals
B. Dividing groups into smaller groups
C. A lotto game called "What's Missing?"
D. Cutting up a banana
my answer I believe c.
If this is the game -- then I disagree with your answer.
http://books.google.com/books?id=4fzeFw6Y5uYC&pg=PA77&lpg=PA77&dq=game+called+%22What%27s+Missing&source=bl&ots=IrgvxjuLo3&sig=8-b9a_zvg6mFkJ6ZqQb6aMuxVNE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=o1rSVMHaKMilyAS4r4K4DA&ved=0CD0Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=game%20called%20%22What's%20Missing&f=false
Yes, I think the answer is A.
To determine which of the activities is not designed for teaching parts and wholes, let's consider each option:
A. Magnetic numerals: Magnetic numerals can be used to teach counting and understanding the concept of quantity. This activity focuses on breaking numbers down into their component parts, making it relevant to teaching about parts and wholes.
B. Dividing groups into smaller groups: Dividing groups into smaller groups involves the concept of partitioning or splitting a whole into parts. This activity directly deals with the idea of parts and wholes.
C. A lotto game called "What's Missing?": This game involves matching similar items and identifying the missing object from a group. While it does involve recognizing patterns and finding missing elements, it may not specifically target teaching parts and wholes. Therefore, it is a possible candidate for an activity not designed for teaching parts and wholes.
D. Cutting up a banana: This activity involves physically dividing the banana into parts. It can help children understand the concept of parts and wholes by demonstrating how a whole object can be broken down into smaller pieces.
Based on this analysis, it appears that C, the lotto game called "What's Missing?", is the activity that is not primarily designed for teaching parts and wholes.