In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court held that? In Chapter 7 Federal Authority and the Limits to State Authority. If I am understanding right that the 10th Amendment trumps the Interstate Commerce Clause. I am I right?

Question

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court held that? In Chapter 7 Federal Authority and the Limits to State Authority. If I am understanding right that the 10th Amendment trumps the Interstate Commerce Clause. I am I right?

Answer 1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbons_v._Ogden

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Answer 2

The states’ rights supersede national authority. Right

Answer 3

No. The Constitution is the supreme law of the United States.

Only those rights not specifically delegated to the federal government are allotted to the states.

Answer 4

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce was granted solely to the federal government, and that state laws interfering with this power were invalid. This landmark case helped establish the scope and supremacy of the Commerce Clause in the U.S. Constitution.

To find the specific holding of the case, we can refer to the Chapter 7 of your textbook or research it online. Generally, to understand court decisions, it is essential to read the actual text of the decision or consult reliable summaries from reputable sources.

Now, regarding your statement about the 10th Amendment trumping the Interstate Commerce Clause, it is important to clarify the relationship between these two constitutional provisions. The 10th Amendment states that any powers not specifically delegated to the federal government by the Constitution are reserved for the states or the people. On the other hand, the Commerce Clause, found in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states.

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court affirmed that the Commerce Clause grants broad authority to Congress to regulate interstate commerce and that state laws interfering with this federal power are unconstitutional. While the 10th Amendment reinforces the rights of the states, it does not negate the authority granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause.

So, to answer your question, the 10th Amendment does not trump the Interstate Commerce Clause as established in Gibbons v. Ogden. It is crucial to consult legal sources and examine specific court decisions to understand the complexities and nuances of constitutional law.