explain the error Janine tells her friend that ordered pairs have an x coordinate of 0 lie on the x axis. She uses the origin as an example. Describe Janine's error. Use a counterexample to explain why Janine statement is false.
When the x = 0 in any point, that point lies on the y-axis
Janine's error is probably not studying or not doing her homework
Janine’s statement is false because when 0 is on the X-axis the point should lie on the y-axis instead. Using the coordinate (0,6) as an example the point should go on the y-axis.
im trying to solve that awnser on my homework DX
Even though the x-axis is on 0, she still needs to move the y-axis either to the left or right which will change it to being on the y axis.
I think she used the origin (0,0) as her example because she might be thinking that since the her x-axis is 0 then the y-axis should be too.I think is the x- axis is in 0 then their is no other place to put it but there too.I got to say she is pretty lazy to do it right.
the the x is 0 then it should always be on the y- axis
Butt U don't care
She’s lazy.
Janine's error in this statement is that she mistakenly equates the x-coordinate of ordered pairs with lying on the x-axis. This is incorrect because ordered pairs with an x-coordinate of 0 do not necessarily lie on the x-axis.
The x-axis is a horizontal line on a coordinate plane, where the y-coordinate is always 0. On the other hand, the ordered pair (0, y) represents a point on the y-axis, where the x-coordinate is always 0.
To provide a counterexample to Janine's statement, we can consider an ordered pair such as (0, 5). This point does not lie on the x-axis because its y-coordinate is 5, not 0. Instead, it lies on the y-axis because its x-coordinate is 0. This demonstrates that an ordered pair with an x-coordinate of 0 does not necessarily lie on the x-axis, contradicting Janine's statement.