Which of the following is NOT a constraint on federal judicial power?
A. Lifetime appointment
B. Presidential nomination
C. Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors
D. Congressional control of judicial jurisdiction
is it A
So many questions posed on here are confusing in the way they're worded. No wonder students get confused! I think you are correct on this one, but B also seems to pose no restraint. Once confirmed and in office, a Supreme Court justice is not constrained by the president who nominated him or her and often advocates legal positions the president who nominated him or her doesn't like.
thank you so much
A is correct.
http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-judicial-powers.html
thanks guys
To determine the correct answer, we need to understand what each of the options represents and then verify if it is a constraint on federal judicial power.
A. Lifetime appointment: This option refers to the fact that federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, are appointed for life. This is indeed a constraint on federal judicial power, as it ensures independence from political pressures and safeguards against arbitrary removal or influence.
B. Presidential nomination: This option pertains to the president's role in nominating federal judges, which is a significant power. However, it is not a constraint; rather, it is an aspect of the appointment process.
C. Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors: This option refers to the ability to impeach federal judges for serious offenses. It is indeed a constraint on federal judicial power, as it provides a mechanism for removing judges who engage in misconduct or abuse of power.
D. Congressional control of judicial jurisdiction: This option addresses the power of Congress to establish and modify the jurisdiction of federal courts. It is indeed a constraint on federal judicial power as it grants Congress the ability to shape the scope of the courts' authority.
Therefore, the correct answer is B. Presidential nomination, as it is not a constraint on federal judicial power but rather a role played by the president in the appointment process.