A mass 'm'is atached to one of an unstreched spring,spring constant k,at time t=0 the free end of the spring experiences a constant acceleration'a',away from the mass. Using the Laplace transformations,

a)Find the position 'x' of 'm' as a function of time.
b)Determine the limiting form of x(t) for small 't'.

I don't know what you mean by the direction "away from the mass." There are an infinite number of directions away from a point.

If there is an acceleration of the mass at t=0, there must be a force then, and I don't see how that can happen if the spring is unstretched at that time.

It is not necessary to use Laplace Transforms for this kind of problem. In my opinion, it just confuses matters. In any case, it has been too unclearly stated to be answerable.

To find the position 'x' of the mass 'm' as a function of time using Laplace transformations, we can start by applying Newton's second law. Newton's second law states that the force acting on an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by its acceleration:

F = m * a

In this case, the force exerted by the spring on the mass is given by Hooke's law:

F = -k * x

where 'x' represents the displacement of the mass from its equilibrium position.

Applying Laplace transformations to the equation F = m * a, we can obtain the following equation:

F(s) = m * s^2 * X(s)

where F(s) and X(s) represent the Laplace transforms of the forces F(t) and the displacement X(t), respectively.

Similarly, applying Laplace transformations to the equation F = -k * x, we have:

F(s) = -k * X(s)

By equating these two expressions for F(s), we get:

m * s^2 * X(s) = -k * X(s)

Rearranging the equation, we can get the expression for X(s):

X(s) = -k / (m * s^2 - k)

To find the position 'x' as a function of time, we need to take the inverse Laplace transform of X(s). Unfortunately, the inverse Laplace transform of X(s) is quite complex and may require more advanced techniques to solve. It would depend on the exact form of the function (m * s^2 - k), which should be specified in the question.

Moving on to part (b), to determine the limiting form of x(t) for small 't', we can use the Taylor series expansion of the function X(s) around s = 0. By expanding X(s) in a power series and taking the inverse Laplace transform, we can determine the behavior of x(t) as t approaches zero. However, since the exact form of the function (m * s^2 - k) is not given, it is not possible to provide a specific answer for this scenario.

In summary, to find the position 'x' of 'm' as a function of time using Laplace transformations, we first need to determine the expression for X(s) by equating the forces acting on the mass. The inverse Laplace transform of X(s) will give us x(t) as a function of time. However, without the specific form of the function (m * s^2 - k), it is not possible to provide a complete solution.