•How do advocates of the crime control model view plea-bargaining?

•How do advocates of the due process control model view plea-bargaining
I can not find this information online. Please help

To understand how advocates of the crime control model and the due process control model view plea-bargaining, it helps to first understand the basic principles of each model.

1. Crime Control Model:
Advocates of the crime control model prioritize public safety and the efficient suppression of crime. They believe in a swift and strict criminal justice system, focusing on crime prevention and apprehension. This model assumes that the majority of individuals arrested and charged with crimes are guilty and should be swiftly processed and convicted.

2. Due Process Control Model:
Advocates of the due process control model prioritize individual rights and protections. They believe that the rights of the accused must be safeguarded, and that the legal system should ensure fairness, accuracy, and the protection of constitutional rights. This model emphasizes the principle of "innocent until proven guilty."

With these principles in mind, let's explore how advocates of each model may view plea-bargaining:

1. Advocates of the Crime Control Model and Plea-Bargaining:
Advocates of the crime control model generally view plea-bargaining as a useful tool for achieving the primary goal of crime control. They see plea-bargaining as an efficient way to quickly dispose of cases, reduce court backlogs, and allocate resources more effectively. In their view, plea-bargaining helps secure convictions and ensures that guilty individuals are quickly held accountable for their crimes.

2. Advocates of the Due Process Control Model and Plea-Bargaining:
Advocates of the due process control model may have mixed views on plea-bargaining. Some may view it as an essential part of the criminal justice system, allowing defendants to exercise their right to a fair trial while also providing an opportunity for securing a more favorable outcome. Others may be critical of plea-bargaining as it can sometimes lead to innocent individuals pleading guilty to avoid the uncertainty and risks associated with trial. They may emphasize the importance of ensuring that defendants fully understand their rights and have access to competent legal counsel during the plea negotiation process.

It is important to note that these views are generalizations, and individual perspectives may vary. To explore further, you may need to consult legal texts, scholarly articles, or research papers that delve into the perspectives of advocates of both models on plea-bargaining.