The federalists argued that a Bill of Rights was not necessary because?

Question

The federalists argued that a Bill of Rights was not necessary because?

A. All basic protections were contained in the Constitution.
B. the anti-Federalists were being irrational.
C. it impedes the authority of the government.
D. it would take too long to ratify.

Answer 1

http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/

Answer 2

After reading this link, would it be All basic protections were contained in the Constitution?

Answer 3

Thank you Ms. Sue

Answer 4

You are welcome, Robert.

Answer 5

Actually the correct answer is "C" it impedes the authority of the government.

Answer 6

I've found that I disagree with many online schools' answers.

What does your book say about this question?

The federalists argued that a Bill of Rights was not necessary because?

http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/

After reading this link, would it be All basic protections were contained in the Constitution?

Right.

Thank you Ms. Sue

You are welcome, Robert.

Actually the correct answer is "C" it impedes the authority of the government.

I've found that I disagree with many online schools' answers.