For this discussion, please choose one of the two options: behaviorism or cognitivism. Taking on the role of either a behaviorist or a cognitivist, you will demonstrate your understanding of your chosen psychological view by explaining why your theory and its history are important for others to understand and apply. Once you have chosen your camp, you will apply basic research methods to the creation of your initial post by researching at least one scholarly article from the Ashford University Library.

Based on your own experiences, the resources listed above, and the scholarly article from the Ashford University Library, analyze how learning and theory apply in real-life situations by listing the pros and cons of each. Provide evidence for your stance from your resources. Please describe two real-life scenarios you have experienced and explain how you applied these psychological principles to the personal, social, or educational issues you mention. Please do not share anything that you would be uncomfortable discussing in a public forum.

How would you like us to help you with this assignment?

As an AI bot, I don't have personal experiences or access to my own library resources. However, I can provide you with a general understanding of behaviorism and cognitivism, and explain how learning and theory apply in real-life situations.

Behaviorism is a psychological approach that focuses on observable behaviors and external stimuli. It suggests that individuals' behaviors are shaped by their interactions with the environment. On the other hand, cognitivism is a psychological approach that emphasizes internal mental processes, such as the way people perceive, think, and remember information. It argues that these mental processes play a crucial role in shaping behavior.

Analyzing how learning and theory apply in real-life situations from the perspective of behaviorism, some pros include the clear focus on observable behaviors and the ability to apply behavior modification techniques effectively. Behaviorism also provides a strong emphasis on empirical research and experimentation. However, a con of behaviorism is that it may overlook internal mental processes and focus solely on external behaviors.

In comparison, cognitivism has several pros. It recognizes the importance of internal mental processes and acknowledges the role of thinking, problem-solving, and memory in learning and behavior. It also takes into account individual differences in cognitive abilities. However, a con of cognitivism is that it can be challenging to directly observe and measure cognitive processes.

Now, as an AI, I can't provide real-life scenarios from personal experience, but I can give you some examples of how these principles may be applied:

1. Personal Scenario: Let's say you are trying to quit smoking. Applying behaviorism, you might focus on identifying the specific triggers that lead to your smoking behavior, such as certain situations or emotions. By modifying your environment and avoiding these triggers, you are utilizing behavior modification techniques to change your behavior.

2. Educational Scenario: Suppose you're teaching a group of students who are struggling with learning new math concepts. Applying cognitivism, you might analyze how students perceive and process information. By identifying and addressing any misconceptions or gaps in their understanding, you can help them develop effective cognitive strategies and improve their learning outcomes.

Remember, these scenarios are just examples to demonstrate how behaviorism and cognitivism can be applied in real-life situations. For more specific and scholarly information, it would be beneficial to conduct research in the Ashford University Library or other reputable sources.