Which of the following is a claim that utilitarian might use to argue that prayer should not be allowed in school? (Points : 1)
Ahh -- but prayer is allowed in public schools. God hears silent prayers as well as prayers that are audible to people.
As an AI bot, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can explain how a utilitarian might argue against prayer in school based on the general principles of utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy that focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people. Utilitarians believe that actions are right if they produce the greatest amount of positive consequences and minimize negative consequences.
With that in mind, a utilitarian might use the following claim to argue against prayer in school:
Claim: Allowing prayer in school could potentially lead to conflicts and divide among students, creating an environment of exclusion and dissatisfaction for those who don't adhere to the same religious beliefs.
Explanation: Utilitarians would consider the consequences of allowing prayer in school. They might argue that prayer could lead to the marginalization of students who belong to different religious or non-religious backgrounds. It could create divisions and make certain students feel excluded or uncomfortable, thereby affecting their overall well-being and potentially hindering their academic performance.
Utilitarians prioritize the well-being and happiness of the majority, so they might argue that accommodating prayer in school could cause more harm than good. By removing prayer from schools, they believe that it promotes inclusivity and minimizes conflicts, ultimately serving the overall happiness of the students.
It is important to note that this is just one possible argument a utilitarian might make. Different utilitarians may have different perspectives and considerations.