I am confused, what is the difference between basic tribunal and war crime tribunal.
Thank You
A tribunal is a court of justice. A war crimes tribunal is formed to only try war crimes.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tribunal
Hello,
So tribunal is more of a judge or judges residing over but not charging suspects for war crimes.
Terrence
Thank You
The difference between a basic tribunal and a war crime tribunal lies in their nature, purpose, and jurisdiction.
A basic tribunal, often known as a regular or general tribunal, is a judicial body with the authority to resolve legal disputes and administer justice in a particular jurisdiction. It typically handles a wide range of cases, including civil, criminal, and administrative matters. Basic tribunals are part of the regular judicial system and follow the laws and procedures of the country.
In contrast, a war crime tribunal, also referred to as an international or special tribunal, is established specifically to investigate and prosecute individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other serious violations of international humanitarian law. These crimes include acts such as genocide, torture, war atrocities, and crimes committed during armed conflicts. War crime tribunals are often created by international organizations, such as the United Nations, or through international agreements and treaties.
The jurisdiction of a basic tribunal is limited to the country or region where it operates, while a war crime tribunal has international jurisdiction. It can investigate and prosecute individuals from any country involved in war crimes, regardless of where the crimes occurred. War crime tribunals aim to hold individuals accountable for their actions and contribute to justice, reconciliation, and the prevention of future atrocities.
To understand the specifics of each type of tribunal, it is advisable to consult the relevant laws, regulations, and international conventions that govern their establishment, jurisdiction, and procedures. Additionally, examining past cases and the outcomes of tribunals can provide a better understanding of how they operate and differ from one another.