I am reading this article Disease, Wilderness Warfare, and Imperial Relations: The Battle for Quebec, 1759--1760
I need to do critical analysis I believe I know what author is trying to argue but a little more clarification would be great.
To perform a critical analysis of the article "Disease, Wilderness Warfare, and Imperial Relations: The Battle for Quebec, 1759--1760," it is essential to first understand the author's argument. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to clarify the author's argument:
1. Start by reading the entire article carefully to gain a comprehensive understanding of its content.
2. Identify the main points and arguments presented throughout the article.
3. Pay attention to the introduction and conclusion sections as they usually provide a clear indication of the overall argument.
4. Look for keywords or phrases that the author uses consistently throughout the text, as they can help reveal the central argument.
5. Examine the evidence and examples provided by the author to support their claims.
6. Consider the author's perspective or point of view and how it shapes their argument.
7. Analyze how the author engages with existing scholarship or academic discussions on the topic.
8. Take note of any counterarguments or alternative viewpoints presented by the author and how they are addressed.
By following these steps, you should be able to clarify the author's argument in the article. Remember to critically evaluate the author's claims and evidence, incorporating your own analysis and perspective as well.