wilken owes rivera $2000. howie promises wilken that he wiol pay rivera the $2000 in return for wilken's promise to give howie's children guitar lessons. is rivera an intended beneficiary of the howie-wilken contract?

yes

To determine if Rivera is an intended beneficiary of the Howie-Wilken contract, we need to consider the requirements for an intended beneficiary.

1. Intention: The first requirement is that there must be a clear intention by the contracting parties to confer a benefit on the third party. In this case, the contract between Howie and Wilken involves Wilken promising to give guitar lessons to Howie's children in exchange for Howie paying the $2000 owed to Rivera. This implies that the benefit of the promise is intended for Rivera, as it would satisfy the debt he is owed.

2. Knowledge: The second requirement is that the third party (Rivera) must have knowledge of the contract and its terms. While it is not explicitly mentioned in the question whether Rivera is aware of the agreement, it can be assumed that Rivera should have knowledge or be informed about the arrangement between Howie and Wilken since it directly pertains to the debt owed to him.

Given these considerations, it can be concluded that Rivera is an intended beneficiary of the Howie-Wilken contract.

To determine whether Rivera is an intended beneficiary of the contract between Howie and Wilken, we need to consider a few factors.

1. Intention: The key question is whether Howie intended to directly confer a benefit upon Rivera by promising to pay Wilken the $2000. In this case, it seems that Howie's promise to pay Wilken does not have direct benefits for Rivera. There is no indication that Howie intended to benefit Rivera specifically.

2. Communication: Did the parties explicitly communicate their intention to confer a benefit on Rivera? If there was a clear intention expressed by Howie that part of the consideration for Wilken's promise was to benefit Rivera, then Rivera could be considered an intended beneficiary. However, from the given information, there is no indication of such communication.

Based on the information provided, it does not seem that Rivera is an intended beneficiary of the Howie-Wilken contract. However, it's important to note that legal conclusions can vary depending on jurisdiction and specific contract terms. It is always advisable to consult a legal professional to obtain accurate advice based on the specific circumstances.