Furthermore, Your Creative Elusive Genius sharply contrasts to John Stuart Mill's Chapter III: Of Individuality as One of the Elements of Well-Being. For instance, Elizabeth Gilbert presents an anecdote of Thomas Waits, who she describes as an anxious and uncontrolled creative artist, until one day, when he is suddenly overcome with a creative compulsion to compose a song while driving, Waits, then, demands the sky to bother him later when he is not busy. According to Gilbert, his creative process following that instance was lighter and easier to manage, as he was no longer internally tormented by the creative genius due to the fact that he chose to believe it was not truly him. Here, Gilbert proves that creativity must be released from the full responsibility of its human being and be seen as a separate entity, most likely of a divine or unknown source, otherwise he will surely crumble under its torturous pressure and emotional misfortunes. On the other hand, Mills would strongly object to this ideal, as he stated within his essay, "Many persons, no doubt, sincerely think that human beings thus cramped and dwarfed, are as their Maker designed them to be...But ... it is more consistent with that faith to believe, that this Being gave all human faculties that they might be cultivated and unfolded, not rooted out and consumed, and that he takes delight in every nearer approach made by his creatures to..increase in any of their capabilities." txt 8 Here, Gilbert presents the idea of creativity as being a destructive encumbrance that human beings must detach from themselves, while Mill offers it as something that must be fostered and grown to its full potential within them.
Why did you start with "Furthermore?" Why are most of the words capitalized in your first sentence?
Your sentences are much too long.