An environmental group claims that a local chemical plant is polluting a nearby river. They are calling for a shutdown of the chemical plant. What evidence would help you the most in evaluating their claim?

Question

An environmental group claims that a local chemical plant is polluting a nearby river. They are calling for a shutdown of the chemical plant. What evidence would help you the most in evaluating their claim?

A.A repeated study that shows chemicals produces by the plant are in the water and harming fish and other wildlife.
B.The credentials of the president of the environmental group.
C.A report that lists the chemicals they claim are being leaked into the river.
D.The URL of the environmental groups website.
Is the answer A?

Answer 1

Yes, the answer is A. A repeated study that shows chemicals produced by the plant are in the water and harming fish and other wildlife would provide the most compelling evidence in evaluating the environmental group's claim. The study would provide scientific data and evidence to support their claim that the chemical plant is polluting the nearby river.

Answer 2

Yes, the correct answer is A. A repeated study that shows chemicals produced by the plant are in the water and harming fish and other wildlife would provide the most relevant evidence in evaluating the claim made by the environmental group. This evidence could be obtained through scientific research and analysis, which involves collecting water samples from the river and testing them for the presence of chemicals emitted by the chemical plant. By studying the impact of these chemicals on the local wildlife, such as fish and other wildlife species, it would be possible to determine whether the plant is indeed polluting the river and causing harm.

An environmental group claims that a local chemical plant is polluting a nearby river. They are calling for a shutdown of the chemical plant. What evidence would help you the most in evaluating their claim?

Right.