Which of the following is not a requirement of ethical systems

None.

In order to determine which of the following options is not a requirement of ethical systems, we first need to identify the components that typically comprise ethical systems. Ethical systems are frameworks or theories that provide principles and guidelines for determining what is morally right or wrong. While there may be different ethical systems with variations in their specific requirements, there are typically a few fundamental elements that most ethical systems share. Let's go through each option and see which one does not align with these common requirements.

1. Consistency: A requirement of ethical systems is consistency, which implies that moral judgments should be applied uniformly across different situations and individuals. Consistency ensures that ethical rules and principles are not arbitrary and that similar cases are treated similarly.

2. Impartiality: Ethical systems generally require impartiality, meaning that individuals should not show favoritism or bias toward any particular person or group. Impartiality ensures fairness and equal treatment.

3. Consequentialism: Some ethical systems emphasize the consequences or outcomes of actions. These systems, known as consequentialist or teleological theories, evaluate the moral rightness or wrongness of an action based on its consequences. Utilitarianism is one such example, where the goal is to maximize overall happiness or utility.

4. Absolutism: Ethical systems may also uphold absolutes, asserting that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of the circumstances or consequences. Absolutist ethical systems typically derive moral rules from fixed principles or beliefs.

Given these requirements, the option that is not typically a requirement of ethical systems is:

3. Consequentialism

While consequentialism is certainly a significant ethical approach, it is not a universal requirement for ethical systems. Other ethical frameworks, such as deontological theories like Kantian ethics, focus on principles and obligations rather than solely on the consequences of actions. Therefore, consequentialism is not an essential requirement for ethical systems.