The idea of original intent claims that

Question

The idea of original intent claims that

A. judges should try to understand what the views of those who authored certain provisions of the Constitution.
B judges should interpret the Constitution on the basis of what the Framers and later authors of various amendments intended when they wrote them.
C.judges who abide by the original intent adapt the intended meaning of the Constitution to modern circumstances.
D. judges should abide by original intent only when it is consistent with mainstream public opinion.

I answered C

Answer 1

Since this is not my area of expertise, I searched Google under the key words "idea of original intent" to get these possible sources:

https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=idea+of+original+intent&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&gws_rd=ssl

In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search. Also see http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/.

Answer 2

The idea of original intent claims that judges should interpret the Constitution based on what the Framers and later authors of various amendments intended when they wrote them. The correct answer, in this case, would be B. This approach suggests that in order to properly understand and interpret the Constitution, judges need to examine the historical context and intentions of those who drafted and ratified it. By doing so, they can better apply the original meaning and purpose of the Constitution to modern circumstances. This perspective argues against judges adapting the intended meaning of the Constitution to fit contemporary views or mainstream public opinion, as stated in answers A, C, and D.