What are the ethical dimensions of bill 94?

(Bill in Quebec that banned face covering in any government funded building such as hospitals, government-subsidized high schools and universities)

I mostly need help on the definition of ethical dimensions, I can't remember what it means.

http://www.google.com/search?q=ethical+dimension+definition&oq=ethical+dimen&aqs=chrome.3.69i57j0l5.5998j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=119&ie=UTF-8

The term "ethical dimensions" refers to the moral aspects or considerations of a particular issue or topic. In the context of Bill 94, which banned face coverings in certain government-funded buildings in Quebec, the ethical dimensions of the issue would involve examining the moral implications and principles underlying the legislation.

To understand the ethical dimensions of Bill 94, it is important to consider different ethical frameworks or perspectives that can inform the analysis. Here are three commonly used ethical frameworks:

1. Rights-based ethics: This perspective emphasizes the protection of individual rights and freedoms. In the case of Bill 94, one might consider the rights to freedom of religion and freedom of expression. Supporters of the bill may argue that it upholds the secular nature of government institutions and promotes equality among citizens. Opponents might argue that it infringes on individuals' rights to practice their religion freely and express their identity.

2. Utilitarian ethics: This approach focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people. When considering the banning of face coverings, proponents might argue that it promotes public safety, identification, and overall social cohesion by ensuring transparency and open communication. Opponents might claim that it could marginalize certain religious or cultural groups and diminish their well-being.

3. Virtue ethics: This framework examines the character traits and virtues that contribute to a good society. Analyzing Bill 94 through this lens would involve considering virtues such as fairness, tolerance, respect for diversity, and the promotion of social harmony. Supporters could argue that the bill promotes fairness by treating everyone equally and fosters social cohesion. Critics might argue that it promotes intolerance and disregards the virtues of understanding and respect for diversity.

To fully examine the ethical dimensions of Bill 94, it is crucial to engage in a thoughtful and inclusive dialogue that takes into account diverse perspectives and value systems. It is important to remember that ethical considerations are often subjective and can vary depending on personal beliefs, cultural backgrounds, and societal norms.