Which statement explains why Britain became a part of the Roman Empire much later than nearby Gaul?
A. Mountains near the coast of Gaul were an obstacle.
B. Rome was not interested in local resources from Britain.
C. Fierce tribes in Britain held of Roman soldiers for many years.
D. The channel of water between Britain and Gaul was an obstacle.
I'll be glad to check your answer.
One can argue both C and D, but I think the better answer is C. The tribes were not so fierce, as they were non-supportive of Rome, except for trade, which they did. The friendliness of each tribe varied, depending on the chieftan, and his ties to the Celtics.
And, until AD 39, Rome was not all that interested in conquering.
I would go with Answer C as the single best answer, albeit I have issues with the "fierce" label. Gaulist tribes were much more fierce.
I'd go with D.
... or maybe B.
Best read up!!
http://www.pegasusarchive.org/ancientbritain/war_firstinvasion.htm
d they would have to go across the channel
its C
To determine which statement explains why Britain became a part of the Roman Empire much later than nearby Gaul, we need to analyze each statement and evaluate its validity.
A. Mountains near the coast of Gaul were an obstacle: This statement suggests that the presence of mountains near the coast of Gaul hindered the expansion of the Roman Empire into Britain. We can evaluate the validity of this statement by researching the geographical features of Gaul and Britain. By consulting historical maps or studying the topography of the region, we can determine if the presence of mountains indeed posed a significant obstacle for the Romans. This requires conducting research on the region's geography.
B. Rome was not interested in local resources from Britain: This statement suggests that Rome did not have a significant interest in exploiting the resources present in Britain, which could have delayed its incorporation into the Roman Empire. To verify this statement's validity, we need to research historical records and documents that highlight Rome's interests and priorities during that period. Analyzing trade patterns, resource distribution, and archaeological evidence can help support or disprove this claim.
C. Fierce tribes in Britain held off Roman soldiers for many years: This statement suggests that the resistance put up by fierce tribes in Britain played a significant role in delaying its inclusion within the Roman Empire. To evaluate this claim, we need to consult historical records, accounts, and primary sources that document any conflicts or resistance faced by Roman soldiers in Britain. Analyzing battle records, archaeological remains, and the writings of historians can provide insights into the extent of the resistance and its impact on the Roman conquest of Britain.
D. The channel of water between Britain and Gaul was an obstacle: This statement proposes that the channel of water separating Britain and Gaul acted as a barrier to Roman expansion. To assess this claim, we need to investigate the navigability of the channel during that time. Historical accounts, geological studies, and archaeological evidence can help determine if the channel indeed posed a significant obstacle to the Romans.
Through research and analysis, we can then determine which statement provides a more accurate explanation for Britain's delayed inclusion in the Roman Empire.