1. Compare and contrast the conflicts faced by Orwell in “Shooting an Elephant” to those faced by Gideon in “No Witchcraft for Sale.” To what unique revelation does Orwell’s position as a police officer lead him? How can Gideon’s ultimate decision not to share his knowledge be interpreted as an act of rebellion and an assertion of the dignity and worth of his culture?
Ha Ha BENIS
I just need some points to get me started. Just some things I need to write about and make sure I cover.
I don't even know where to start.
You can start by listing the conflicts in each story.
Did you follow Ms Sue's directions and make a list of all the conflicts in the two stories?
I did. Thank you both for your help. Making a list did help get me started, and I just completed the assignment.
Cathrine do you mind helping me i'm having trouble and my end date is almost here
To compare and contrast the conflicts faced by Orwell in "Shooting an Elephant" and Gideon in "No Witchcraft for Sale," we first need to analyze the texts to identify the conflicts and their unique aspects. Then, we can examine the implications of Orwell's position as a police officer and how Gideon's decision relates to rebellion and cultural significance.
To understand Orwell's conflicts in "Shooting an Elephant," one should reread the text and identify the various tensions he experiences. Orwell's main conflict revolves around being caught between his personal beliefs and the expectations of the imperialist regime he represents. On one hand, he empathizes with the Burmese people and dislikes the oppressive nature of the British Empire. On the other hand, he feels compelled to carry out his duties as a police officer and is pressured by the locals to shoot an elephant that has caused destruction.
Orwell's unique revelation comes when he realizes that the expectations placed upon him by his role as a police officer ultimately dehumanize him as well as the Burmese people. He describes how he resents the power dynamic, being forced to act against his will solely because he is seen as the representative of the British Empire. This realization leads him to understand how imperial power distorts both the oppressor and the oppressed, highlighting his moral conflict and deepening his understanding of the Burmese struggle.
Turning our attention to Gideon in "No Witchcraft for Sale," we should revisit the story to identify the conflicts he faces. Gideon is a native herbalist whose knowledge of a particular plant can cure snake bites. The conflict arises when a British family, the Farquars, request his assistance after their son is bitten by a snake. They want Gideon to share his knowledge, but he refuses, as it is considered a secret of his culture.
Gideon's decision not to share his knowledge with the Farquars can be interpreted as an act of rebellion and a demonstration of the dignity and worth of his culture. By keeping this powerful knowledge within his community, he asserts the value and importance of his heritage. Gideon, unlike Orwell, isn't driven by a position of power but rather by a desire to preserve the integrity and uniqueness of his cultural practices. Through his refusal, Gideon refuses to succumb to the pressure of assimilation and maintains the pride and significance of his traditions.
In summary, to compare and contrast the conflicts faced by Orwell in "Shooting an Elephant" and Gideon in "No Witchcraft for Sale," you should analyze each text separately to understand the unique tensions each character experiences. Analyzing Orwell's situation as a police officer allows us to understand his revelation about the dehumanizing effect of imperial power. Gideon's decision not to share his knowledge can be seen as an act of rebellion, affirming the dignity and worth of his culture.
That's your assignment, which no one will write for you. Have you read both stories?
What are your questions about your assignment?