1. A description of the statute 18 U.S.C. Section 3501 is:
A. An act of Congress that confirmed the Miranda v. Arizona decision.
B. The U.S. Code designation assigned to the Crime Control Act of 1968, which attempted to invalidate the Miranda v. Arizona decision.
C. The official legislation that provided exceptions to the use of Miranda.
D. The U.S. Code assigned for the Supreme Court case that ruled Miranda unnecessary when public safety is a more pressing concern than personal privacy
is it C
2. What is a critique of citizen oversight?
A. Citizens are predisposed to dislike police, so citizen oversight cannot be fair.
B. Its effectiveness in reducing or eliminating misconduct is unclear.
C. Citizen oversight implies that police cannot police themselves.
D. Police will not cooperate with citizen oversight, so it’s not an effective program.
im confused between B and C
1. Yes.
2. B
1. To determine the correct answer, we need to understand what 18 U.S.C. Section 3501 refers to. To do so, you can search for the statute online or refer to a legal resource like the United States Code. Once you have access to the content of the statute, you can review its description and purpose. Based on your understanding of the options provided, you can then select the option that aligns with the description of the statute.
2. When assessing the critique of citizen oversight, it is essential to consider the various perspectives and criticisms. To determine the correct answer, you can analyze the given options and evaluate which one best reflects a valid critique of citizen oversight. Consider the arguments made in each option and compare them to your knowledge and understanding of the topic. Additionally, you can conduct research or refer to reputable sources to gather more information on the subject and make an informed decision.