If you consider The Call of the Wild to be an allegory, which one of the following statements would be true: Judge Miller represents the primordial condition.B Buck represents some characteristic of humanity
See Related Questions below.
To determine which statement is true if we consider "The Call of the Wild" to be an allegory, we first need to understand the concepts of allegory and the characters in the story.
Allegory is a literary device in which characters, events, and settings represent abstract ideas or moral qualities. In allegorical works, the characters often have symbolic meanings beyond their literal interpretation.
In "The Call of the Wild" by Jack London, Judge Miller is Buck's original owner, a wealthy and civilized man who represents the comfortable and safe domestic life that Buck leaves behind. Buck is the protagonist, a domesticated dog who gradually reverts to his wild instincts while facing the challenges of the harsh environment.
Considering this, if we view "The Call of the Wild" as an allegory, the statement "Judge Miller represents the primordial condition" would be more likely to be true. The primordial condition refers to the state of nature, the wild and untouched environment in which animals follow their instincts to survive. Judge Miller symbolizes this state because he represents Buck's initial life, which is domesticated and far removed from the wild.
On the other hand, while Buck may exhibit certain characteristics of humanity, the primary allegorical representation in this story would likely be Judge Miller as the primordial condition rather than Buck representing humanity.
Remember, when analyzing literature for allegory, it's important to consider the symbols, themes, and broader meaning of the story to determine the most accurate interpretation.