Agatha maintains that people are capable of freely making voluntary choices. Constance is mainly focused on how aggression is caused by genetic inheritance. It seems reasonable to assume that Constance is not much interested in environmental factors impacting behavior while Agatha rejects
What is your subject? What is your question? Do you really expect academic help?
Agatha maintains that people are capable of making choices. Constance is mainly focused on how aggression is caused by genetic inheritance. It seems reasonable to assum that constance is not much interested in enviromental factors impacting behavior while agathe rejects
When I initially left a comment I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on whenever a comment is added I receive 4 emails with the same comment. Perhaps there is a means you are able to remove me from that service? Many thanks!
I delight in, lead to I discovered just what I used to be looking for. You have ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye
the idea that genetic inheritance plays a significant role in aggression.
To support this assumption, you can refer to Agatha's belief in people's capability to freely make voluntary choices. This suggests that Agatha places greater emphasis on individual agency and personal responsibility, implying that she likely considers environmental factors as influential in shaping behavior.
On the other hand, Constance's concentration on the genetic inheritance aspect suggests a belief that aggression is largely predetermined by our genes, regardless of external factors. This implies that Constance might not prioritize examining the impact of environmental factors on behavior since genetic inheritance is seen as the primary cause.
It is important to note that this assumption is based on the limited information provided, and their beliefs may vary depending on individual perspectives and the specific context being discussed. To gain a more accurate understanding of their positions, it would be best to engage in a direct conversation or further research on their respective stances.