In response to which acts did colonial opposition become violent?

stamp act
sugar act
townshend act
tea act

I'll be glad to check your answer.

i was just gonna say c

No.

https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=EiVKW4SILtGAtgXzoLSAAQ&q=+which+acts+did+colonial+opposition+become+violent&oq=+which+acts+did+colonial+opposition+become+violent&gs_l=psy-ab.3...5986.5986.0.7271.2.1.0.0.0.0.164.164.0j1.1.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..1.0.0.0...0.FfkNjZNZnRA

so the is it just the stamp act, or one other

It's the Stamp Act.

Colonial opposition in the American colonies became violent in response to several acts imposed by the British Parliament. Specifically, the Stamp Act, Sugar Act, Townshend Act, and Tea Act provoked significant resistance and ultimately led to outbreaks of violence.

To understand why these acts resulted in violent opposition, it is essential to have some background knowledge. The American colonies were under British rule during the 18th century, and the British government implemented various acts to maintain control and generate revenue from the colonies.

1. Stamp Act (1765):
The Stamp Act required that all printed materials in the colonies, such as newspapers, legal documents, and playing cards, be produced on stamped paper with a tax imposed by the British government. This direct tax on the colonies outraged many colonists who felt they were being unjustly taxed without their consent or representation in Parliament.

The opposition to the Stamp Act started with protests, boycotts, and non-importation agreements. However, it eventually escalated to acts of violence, including mob actions against stamp distributors, tarring and feathering of British officials, and the destruction of stamped paper.

2. Sugar Act (1764):
The Sugar Act was passed to increase taxes on imported molasses, sugar, wine, and other luxury goods. It aimed to combat the rampant smuggling that occurred in the colonies by reducing the tax on molasses but increasing enforcement against illicit trade. Although violent opposition to the Sugar Act was relatively limited, it further contributed to the growing discontent among the colonists regarding taxation without representation.

3. Townshend Act (1767):
The Townshend Act imposed import taxes on various goods such as glass, lead, tea, paper, and paint. It was an attempt to gain revenue from the colonies while asserting Parliament's authority to tax. The colonial response to this act included organized boycotts, riots, and protests by colonists who believed that these taxes violated their rights as British subjects.

4. Tea Act (1773):
The Tea Act was one of the most significant factors leading to the American Revolution. It gave the British East India Company a monopoly on the tea trade in the colonies by allowing them to import tea without paying normal duties. This act was considered a threat to colonial merchants and small business owners. In response, a group of colonists, known as the Sons of Liberty, boarded British ships in Boston Harbor in the famous Boston Tea Party incident. They threw the cargoes of tea overboard, symbolizing their opposition to the Tea Act and their willingness to use violence to resist British rule.

In summary, colonial opposition turned violent primarily in response to the Stamp Act, Townshend Act, and Tea Act. These acts represented a pattern of taxation without colonial consent and provoked widespread resistance among the colonists, culminating in acts of violence such as riots, boycotts, and the destruction of property.