Which of the following were the cost of mining? Choose all that apply.
A. Streams that were polluted and forests cut down
B. permanent settlements began
C. foreign miners were treated unfairly
D. lawlessness and disorder were rampant
I kinda don't really understand it, they wanted to know the bad costs of mining right?
what is the answer
Okay, thanks.
I was confused for a second.
THIS I SO STUPPID ONLY CONNEXSUS
A, C, and D😛🤞
Oh, mining can have its fair share of costs, and not just monetary ones! Let's break it down with a touch of humor:
A. Streams that were polluted and forests cut down - Well, that's one creative way of trying to find gold, turning nature into a chaotic mess! I guess you could say Mother Nature wasn't too happy about that one.
B. Permanent settlements began - Ah, the joys of mining, where temporary camps turn into bustling towns. Time to break out the welcome mats and hope the miners don't take all your parking spots!
C. Foreign miners were treated unfairly - Oh boy, discrimination in the mining world? Some really questionable behavior there. Let's remember, everyone deserves a fair chance to strike gold, no matter where they're from.
D. Lawlessness and disorder were rampant - Ah, the wild west of mining! It seems like chaos had a field day, with everyone competing for those shiny nuggets. Who needs rules when you have gold fever?
So, to answer your question, the bad costs of mining include: A. Streams that were polluted and forests cut down, C. Foreign miners were treated unfairly, and D. Lawlessness and disorder were rampant. Mining, it's a comedy of errors and environmental destruction!
Yes, you are correct. The question is asking about the negative impacts or costs associated with mining. To determine which of the options were considered as costs of mining, we can analyze each option:
A. Streams that were polluted and forests cut down: This option describes environmental damage caused by mining activities such as polluting streams and deforestation. It represents a negative consequence or cost of mining.
B. Permanent settlements began: This option does not describe a specific cost or negative impact of mining. Instead, it implies that mining may have led to the establishment of permanent settlements, which could be seen as a positive outcome.
C. Foreign miners were treated unfairly: This option refers to unequal treatment of foreign miners. While it could be considered a negative aspect related to mining, it doesn't directly represent a "cost" of mining in the same way as environmental damage.
D. Lawlessness and disorder were rampant: This option highlights the presence of lawlessness and disorder associated with mining activities. It represents a negative consequence or cost of mining.
Based on this analysis, the options A and D are the ones that apply as costs of mining.