Which of the following are ways that lobbyist can influence judicial decision making? Select all that apply (2 points)
A:meeting face to face with legislators.
B:submitting amicus curiae briefs.***
C:bringing lawsuits to the court.***
D:encouraging members to contact Congress
Are these correct?
Yes, you are correct. Lobbyists can influence judicial decision making through submitting amicus curiae briefs (option B) and bringing lawsuits to the court (option C).
Submitting amicus curiae briefs allows lobbyists to provide additional information and perspectives to the court on a particular case. These briefs are filed by individuals or organizations not directly involved in the case but have an interest in the outcome. Lobbyists can use amicus curiae briefs to present arguments and evidence that support their positions.
Bringing lawsuits to the court refers to the practice of lobbyists filing lawsuits on behalf of individuals, organizations, or interest groups they represent. By initiating legal actions, lobbyists can influence judicial decision making by advancing their clients' interests and shaping the legal issues that are brought before the court for consideration.
Therefore, options B and C (submitting amicus curiae briefs and bringing lawsuits to the court) are the correct ways in which lobbyists can influence judicial decision making.