1. how do mans reasoning ablities and his "diversity of faculties" contribute to factions?

2. if a faction consists of less than a majority how does publius say it may be controlled?

3. what two recommendations does publius make regarding majority factions?

4. why cannot pure democracies prevent factions from forming?

5.voters will chose men with the "most attractive _________ and the most diffusive and __________ characters."

5. with the federal system of government the national governments foucus is on the "great and ______ interest" while "local" and "particular" issues will be handeled by the state ___________.

these questions are based on a noble experiment: the history and nature of the american government by Zeezok publishing

lesson 14 activity - federalist #10

Interesting questions. I'm sure your teacher is eager to see your answers.

1. Madison believed that the diversity of human faculties and reasoning abilities could contribute to factions in several ways. Firstly, because individuals have different interests, beliefs, and passions, they are likely to form groups or factions with others who share similar views. Secondly, people's reasoning abilities may lead them to form factions based on different interpretations of the same facts or situations. For example, one group may have a more optimistic view of the future, while another may have a more pessimistic view, leading them to form different factions.

To answer this question, you need to refer to the text "Federalist #10" by James Madison. You can find this document in various online databases or books that contain the complete collection of Federalist Papers. Reading Madison's arguments in his own words will give you a more comprehensive understanding of how he directly addressed the connection between man's reasoning abilities and the formation of factions.

2. According to Publius (the collective pseudonym used by the authors of the Federalist Papers), if a faction consists of less than a majority, it can be controlled through a republican form of government. In a republic, representatives are elected to make decisions on behalf of the people. This system provides a check on the power of factions because the elected representatives can deliberate and consider the interests of all citizens, not just those of the faction. Furthermore, the system of representation can dilute the influence of factions by requiring broad coalitions to advance their causes.

To find Publius' argument on how factions can be controlled in a republican form of government, refer to "Federalist #10". Reading the specific section on controlling factions will give you the exact explanation and reasoning behind Publius's recommendations.

3. Publius makes two recommendations regarding majority factions in "Federalist #10." First, he argues that a large and diverse republic is less likely to be dominated by a majority faction. With a greater number of representatives and a diverse range of voices, it is more difficult for one faction to gain control over the others. Second, Publius suggests that the public must be educated and informed about the dangers of factions to protect against majority factions undermining the rights and interests of minority groups.

To find Publius's two recommendations regarding majority factions, refer to the relevant section in "Federalist #10." Reading Madison's arguments in his own words will give you a clearer understanding of his specific recommendations and the reasoning behind them.

4. Pure democracies cannot prevent factions from forming because they lack the mechanisms to check the power of the majority. In a pure democracy, where decisions are made directly by the majority of the people, there is no buffer or intermediary between the majority and the minority. This means that the rights and interests of minority factions can easily be disregarded or oppressed by the majority. Therefore, pure democracies are susceptible to the tyranny of the majority and are unable to prevent the formation and dominance of factions.

To understand why pure democracies cannot prevent factions from forming, you should refer to the relevant section in "Federalist #10." Madison explains this issue in detail, highlighting why the framers of the Constitution opted for a republican form of government with checks and balances rather than a pure democracy.

5. According to Publius in "Federalist #10," voters will choose men with the most attractive "talents" and the most diffusive and "united" characters. The talents refer to the abilities, skills, and qualities that make a person capable of effective governance. The diffusive and united characters symbolize individuals whose interests and beliefs are broadly aligned with the whole nation rather than being confined to a particular faction or locality.

To find the specific section where Publius discusses the qualities voters look for in candidates, refer to "Federalist #10." Reading the original text will provide you with a more nuanced understanding of the statements made by Publius.

5. With the federal system of government, the national government's focus is on the "great and general interest" while "local" and "particular" issues will be handled by the state governments. The federal system of government divides power and responsibilities between the national government and the individual state governments. The national government is primarily responsible for issues that affect the entire country or have a significant impact on multiple states, while state governments have more authority over local matters that directly affect their respective populations.

To understand this concept in more detail, you can refer to relevant sections in the U.S. Constitution, particularly articles and sections related to federalism or the division of powers. Additionally, reading about federalism in various civics or government textbooks can provide more information on the specific roles and powers of the different levels of government in a federal system.