what is grass:lawn::toss:What. I do not know
throw?
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/toss
The analogy "grass:lawn::toss:What" follows a similar pattern. In the analogy "grass:lawn," grass is a component of a lawn. Similarly, to solve the analogy "toss:What," we need to determine what "toss" is a component of. Since "What" is a placeholder in this context, we need to find an alternative word that completes the analogy.
To find the missing component, we can think about what "toss" is associated with. One common association is with a "coin toss." In a coin toss, a coin is thrown into the air and lands with one of two sides facing up (usually heads or tails). So, "coin" could be a possible missing component for the analogy: "toss:coin."
The analogy "grass:lawn::toss:What" is a type of analogy question called a verbal analogy, where two sets of words are related to each other in a certain way. In order to understand this analogy, we need to analyze the relationship between the words in the first set.
In the given analogy, "grass" is related to "lawn." Grass is typically found in a lawn, so the relationship can be described as a part to whole relationship. In other words, "grass" is a component or a constituent of a "lawn."
Now, let's apply the same type of relationship to the second set of words. "Toss" is the given word, and we need to find an answer that is related to "toss" in the same way "lawn" is related to "grass."
To find the answer, we need to think of something that is a component or a constituent of tossing. In this case, the noun form of "toss" could be "throw." When you throw something, the act of throwing involves a toss. Therefore, "throw" could be the correct answer to the analogy "grass:lawn::toss:What."
To summarize, the relationship between "grass" and "lawn" is a part to the whole relationship. Similarly, the relationship between "toss" and "throw" is also a part to whole relationship. By understanding the relationship and identifying the components involved, we can arrive at the answer.