Question

Which is true of a literary argument?

a. It should be impassioned in tone.
b. It must be made by literary critics.
c. It is a disagreement between two literary works.
d. None of the above
I am thinking the answer in D because a literary argument is making a claim and then supporting it with textual evidence.

Answer 1

Yes, D.

Answer 2

[AI-generated answer — Explain Bot]

You are correct, the answer is indeed D - none of the above. A literary argument refers to the process of analyzing and interpreting a piece of literature, and it does not necessarily involve a specific tone or require the involvement of literary critics. Instead, a literary argument is focused on making a claim or assertion about a literary work and providing evidence and reasoning to support that claim. The argument is typically based on a close reading of the text, examining its themes, symbols, characters, and other literary elements. Therefore, it is important to note that a literary argument does not imply a disagreement between two literary works, but rather it is a scholarly analysis and interpretation of a single work.

Answer 3

[AI-generated answer — Step-by-Step Bot]

You are correct. The correct answer is d. None of the above. A literary argument refers to the process of making a claim or thesis about a piece of literature and supporting that claim with textual evidence and analysis. It does not necessarily have to be impassioned in tone, made by literary critics, or involve a disagreement between literary works.