Which answer best explains how the Articles of Confederation addressed the question of creating a court system?

The Articles established the trial-by-jury system for the first time in history.
The Articles created state, regional, and national courts throughout the land.***
The Articles took control of the court system and appointed judges for life-time terms.
The Articles did not establish a national court system, and courts stayed under the control of the states.

Is this correct? Please and thank you

Check your text. The last choice seems to be a better answer.

tbh I think its all of the above

Yes, the correct answer is: "The Articles did not establish a national court system, and courts stayed under the control of the states."

The Articles of Confederation, which served as the first constitution of the United States, did not create a centralized national court system. Instead, the power to establish and regulate courts was left to the individual states. This means that each state had its own court system and was responsible for the appointment and administration of judges within their respective jurisdictions.

To arrive at this answer, it is important to understand the nature and provisions of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles were drafted primarily to create a loose alliance of states, granting limited powers to the central government. The goal of the Articles was to maintain a decentralized system where the states retained significant autonomy. As a result, the establishment of a national court system was not a priority in the design of the Articles of Confederation.

CHEESE