"Congress has not declared war since ww2. In eight occasions since then however it has a natural joint resolutions to authorize the president to meet certain International crisis with military force"

What is the strongest conclusion that can be drawn from this statement?
A. Congress and the president are often in Conflict about when to declare war
B. Congress and the president do everything they can to avoid using military force
C the Constitution is flexible enough to allow Congress and the president to meet crisis in a number of ways <<<
D. the Constitution has many checks and balances for how the government deals with foreign policy

One more!!

What is the intent of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 document?
A. to expand congress's power to authorize the president to come into the US to military action
B. to give Congress the authorization to commit the US to military action
C. to expand the power of the United States armed forces to initiate military activity on their own
D. to limit the president's power to commit to the US to military action without meeting certain conditions<<<<

Both your answers are right.

The strongest conclusion that can be drawn from the given statement is that the Constitution is flexible enough to allow Congress and the president to meet crises in a number of ways.

To come to this conclusion, we can analyze the statement's implications. It states that Congress has not declared war since World War II but has authorized the president to use military force in certain international crises through joint resolutions. This suggests that the Constitution allows for alternative mechanisms, such as joint resolutions, to address international crises without a formal declaration of war.

Therefore, option C, "the Constitution is flexible enough to allow Congress and the president to meet crises in a number of ways," is the strongest conclusion that can be drawn from the statement.