Which answer best describes why some view the senate as undemocratic?
The vice president is the leader of the senate.*****
The senate and the house don't have the same powers.
Everyone living in the state can can vote for that states Senate regardless of there home district.
Every state has equal representation in the senate regardless of its population
Becky is correct but I’m case anyone is skeptical I’ll say the full answers rather than just a b c or d
1. D, they deal with particular policy matters
2. A, all new bills must pass through this committee
3. C, Joint committees focus on specific issues, while conference committees align each chambers version of the same bill
4. D, Every state has equal representation in the senate regardless of its population
5. C, to accommodate changes in state populations
6. A, C, age and size of constituencies
7. D, making laws
8. A, they serve two-year terms
9. C, Congressional districts were drawn to favor rural areas
10. B, to have a system of checks on power
If the answers aren’t the same for you then you have a different quiz and I can’t help you I’m sorry
1. D
2. A
3. C
4. D
5. C
6. AGE AND SIZE OF CONSTITUENUS
7. D
8. A
9. C
10. B
11/11 (100%)
Ah, the Senate, the fancy schmancy club of politicians. Some people view it as undemocratic because of the whole "vice president as the leader" situation. Yes, you heard me right, the VP gets to call the shots in the Senate. Talk about having too much power! But hey, maybe they're just trying to compensate for something... who knows?
And speaking of power, let's not forget that the Senate and the House don't exactly have the same powers. It's like they're sibling rivals, always bickering about who gets to make the big decisions. Can't they just get along, for goodness' sake?
But wait, there's more! In the Senate, everyone living in a state can vote for their state's Senators, regardless of where they actually live. Imagine that, voting for a Senator who doesn't even represent your home district. It's like playing a twisted game of political hide-and-seek.
And let's not ignore the elephant in the room (or rather, the donkey). Every state has equal representation in the Senate, no matter how big or small its population is. So, whether you're from a bustling metropolis or a tiny town with more cows than people, you get the same say in the Senate. It's like the United States of Equality, or something.
So, there you have it. The Senate may be undemocratic because of the VP's influence, the power disparity with the House, the voting shenanigans, and the whole equal representation thing. It's enough to make you want to join a circus instead, am I right?
The answer that best describes why some view the Senate as undemocratic is that every state has equal representation in the Senate regardless of its population.
The answer "Every state has equal representation in the senate regardless of its population" best describes why some view the senate as undemocratic. To understand why, we need to understand the structure and composition of the Senate.
The United States Senate consists of two senators from each state, totaling 100 senators. This means that regardless of a state's population, it will have an equal number of senators representing it. For example, California, the most populous state, and Wyoming, the least populous state, both have two senators each.
This equality in representation is seen by some as undemocratic because it means that less populous states have the same voting power as more populous states. In other words, the vote of a citizen in a less populous state carries more weight than the vote of a citizen in a more populous state. This can be seen as a violation of the principle of "one person, one vote" and is often criticized as being unfair and not reflecting the true demographic diversity and distribution of the population.
To summarize, the equal representation of states in the Senate, regardless of their population, is viewed by some as undemocratic because it gives disproportionate power to citizens in less populous states and undermines the principle of proportional representation based on population size.