whilst entrepreneurship is a panacea to the world over, the current Zimbabwean situation is different .eludicate four reasons why the situation is different
From Wikipedia: <<Since 2000, Zimbabwe has seized and forcibly redistributed most of the country's white owned commercial farms. The new occupants, which included black only citizens and several prominent members of the ruling ZANU-PF administration, were usually inept, inexperienced, or uninterested in farming – thereby failing to retain the labour-intensive, highly efficient management of previous landowners.[14] Short term gains were achieved by selling the land or equipment. The contemporary lack of agricultural expertise has triggered severe export losses and negatively affected market confidence. Idle land is now being utilised by local peasants practising meagre subsistence farming. Production of staple foodstuffs, such as maize, has recovered accordingly – unlike typical export crops including tobacco and coffee.[15] Zimbabwe has also sustained the 30th occurrence of recorded hyperinflation in world history.[16]
Government spending is 97.8% of GDP. State enterprises are strongly subsidized, taxes and tariffs are high. State regulation is costly to companies, starting or closing a business is slow and costly.[17] Labor market is highly regulated, hiring a worker is cumbersome and firing a worker is difficult. By 2008 unemployment had risen to 94%>>
So being a entereprneur? There is no reward for success.