When enough experimental data support a hypothesis, the hypothesis then becomes a
fact
theory
inference
conclusion
I am torn between theory and conclusion
conclusion
so whats the answers?
When enough experimental data support a hypothesis, the hypothesis then becomes a theory.
When enough experimental data support a hypothesis, the hypothesis then becomes a theory.
To understand why a hypothesis becomes a theory, it's important to clarify the meanings of these terms in the scientific context:
1. Fact: A fact is a statement that is proven to be true and is widely accepted as truth. It is based on direct observation and evidence.
2. Hypothesis: A hypothesis is an educated guess or proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through experimentation and observation.
3. Theory: A theory is a well-substantiated explanation for a broad range of observations and evidence. It is supported by a significant amount of empirical data and has withstood repeated testing and scrutiny. A scientific theory is more than just a speculation or opinion. It provides a framework to understand and explain a wide range of phenomena.
4. Inference: An inference is a logical conclusion based on available evidence and reasoning. It may not require as much empirical support as a theory.
Given the definitions above, when enough experimental data supports a hypothesis and it has been thoroughly tested and validated, it can then be elevated to a scientific theory. The data collected through various experiments and observations provide strong evidence that supports the hypothesis, allowing it to be generalized and considered more than just an inference or a conclusion.
Therefore, in this case, the correct answer would be theory.