Discrete Mathematics and its Application
posted by Monique
Am not understanding , how to do the truth or Venn diagram to show a statement pv(q^r)is equivalent to (pvq)^(pvr). How can I show the statement is not equivalent to (pvq)^r.
I have to explain my answer in truth or Venn diagram, but my problem really is Word Problem, and that were I messup at? Please help. I need a step by step of what I'm suppose to do.

Steve
By "truth" do you mean a truth table? If so, just list the 8 rows and the 8 values of the functions, and it is easy to show which are equivalent.
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

Math Truth Tables
Construct a Truth Table for the given statement: 1. p implies ~(pVq) 2. ~(p AND q)Vp I thought this is how to do it, but my teacher marked it incorrect: 1. p q ~(pVq) p implies ~(pVq) T T F T implies T= T T F F T implies F= F F T F … 
Math Truth Tables
Construct a Truth Table for the given statement: 1. p implies ~(pVq) 2. ~(p AND q)Vp I thought this is how to do it, but my teacher marked it incorrect: 1. p q ~(pVq) p implies ~(pVq) T T F T implies T= T T F F T implies F= F F T F … 
Math
Construct a Truth Table for the given statement: 1. p implies ~(pVq) 2. ~(p AND q)Vp I thought this is how to do it, but my teacher marked it incorrect: 1. p q ~(pVq) p implies ~(pVq) T T F T implies T= T T F F T implies F= F F T F … 
Math
Construct a Truth Table for the given statement: 1. p implies ~(pVq) 2. ~(p AND q)Vp 
Math
Construct a Truth Table for the given statement: 1. p implies ~(pVq) 2. ~(p AND q)Vp 
discrete mathematics with applications
Determine which of the following pairs of statements forms are logically equivalent. Justify your answer using truth tables and include a few words of explanation. Read "t" to be a tautology and "c" to be a contradiction: 26. (p^q)v(p^r)and(pvq)^r … 
3 grade math ms sue
1Explain how you can use a number line to show that 3/6 and 1/2 are equivalent fractions. my son write you can show these fractions are equivalent because if the numerator is half of the denomirator it can be 1/2 so 3/6 is just like … 
Philosophy
First, translate the following statement pair into the symbols of propositional logic (use the letters P and R) (a) We will have a picnic unless it happens to rain (b) We won’t have a picnic only if it happens to rain Second, use … 
Discreet math
[(pvq)^(p=>)^(q=>)]=>r[(pvq)^(p=>)^(q=>)]=>r 
Logic / Discrete Mathematics
Show that "¬p Λ q is logically equivalent to p → ¬q" . I'm not sure if the conditional identity is correct, but what I did was I negated the whole second condition and it immediately became equal to the first?