on 6 of 20

5.0 Points
Which of the following would constitute a copyright infringement?
A. a brief quotation in a news report
B. use of copyrighted material in a spoof or satire
C. using several clips from a movie in a documentary
D. reproduction of a small part of a classic novel by a teacher to illustrate a lesson

Answer B

sorry it is C

Yes, C.

thanks

YW

To determine which of the options would constitute a copyright infringement, we need to understand the concept of copyright and its restrictions.

Copyright is a legal protection provided to original creations such as books, music, movies, and artwork. It grants the creator or owner of the work the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform their work, among other rights.

Based on the options provided, let's evaluate each one:

A. A brief quotation in a news report: This would likely fall under fair use, a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright owner, as long as it is for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. Therefore, this would not constitute a copyright infringement.

B. Use of copyrighted material in a spoof or satire: Generally, the use of copyrighted material in a parody, spoof, or satire can be considered fair use. These works typically transform or comment on the original work, potentially making it a protected form of expression. Therefore, this would not usually constitute a copyright infringement.

C. Using several clips from a movie in a documentary: The use of copyrighted material in a documentary can also be considered fair use, as long as it meets the criteria of transformative and informational use. Documentaries often rely on the inclusion of copyrighted content for commentary or critique purposes. Therefore, this would not typically constitute a copyright infringement.

D. Reproduction of a small part of a classic novel by a teacher to illustrate a lesson: Using a small part of a copyrighted work for educational purposes, such as illustrating a lesson, may also fall under fair use. However, it is essential to consider the nature of the copying, the amount used, and the effect on the market for the original work. Given that it is a small part of the novel and for educational purposes, this would likely be deemed fair use and not constitute copyright infringement.

Based on the evaluation above, options A, B, C, and D would not generally constitute copyright infringement. Since the question asks which one would constitute infringement, the correct answer would be option B, as it goes against the general understanding of fair use in the context of parody, satire, and spoofs.