1. You should not miss breakfast.
2. You should not skip breakfast.
---------------------------------
Are both the same? What is the diffference?
3. Stand in a row.
4. Stand in row.
5. stand in rows.
6. stand in two rows.
(Can we use the expressions above?)
1 and 2 mean the same thing, yes.
#4 is not good. #5 is too vague; it doesn't say how many rows, so is confusing. #3 and #6 are fine, and specific (one row, two rows).
1. "You should not miss breakfast" means that it is important to not skip or skip over eating breakfast. It emphasizes the idea of not neglecting or overlooking breakfast.
2. "You should not skip breakfast" means the same thing as the first sentence. It emphasizes the idea of not omitting or intentionally not eating breakfast.
In terms of meaning, both sentences convey the same message that it is important to not skip breakfast. The only difference lies in the choice of words. Some people may have a preference for one phrasing over the other, but the core message remains the same.
Regarding the expressions:
3. "Stand in a row" is grammatically correct and means that people should align themselves in a single line.
4. "Stand in row" is not grammatically correct. It is missing the article "a" before "row". It should be corrected to "Stand in a row."
5. "Stand in rows" is grammatically correct and means that people should align themselves in multiple lines.
6. "Stand in two rows" is grammatically correct and means that people should arrange themselves in two lines.
So, sentences 3, 5, and 6 are correct expressions, while sentence 4 should be corrected.