Why are philosophical questions not answered with facts?
Philosophical questions are not typically answered with facts because they often deal with abstract concepts, subjective experiences, and deep uncertainties that cannot be easily resolved by factual evidence alone. Philosophy seeks to explore fundamental questions about the nature of reality, knowledge, ethics, and the meaning of life. These questions involve a wide range of perspectives, interpretations, and theories, making it difficult to arrive at a single factual answer.
Instead, philosophers use logical reasoning, critical thinking, and conceptual analysis to dissect complex issues and offer different perspectives and arguments. They may consider empirical evidence, but their primary focus is on engaging in rigorous conceptual exploration rather than arriving at definitive factual answers.
Moreover, philosophical questions often transcend the boundaries of empirical observation, leading to debates about metaphysical, moral, or epistemological aspects of reality. These questions rely on subjective judgments, personal experiences, and individual interpretations, which cannot be easily reduced to objective facts. Philosophers aim to deepen our understanding and challenge preconceived notions, rather than providing universally accepted factual truths.
Therefore, philosophical questions are not answered with facts because they often lack simple, straightforward solutions that can be supported by empirical evidence. They require thoughtful reflection, critical analysis, and a willingness to engage in ongoing philosophical discourse.