What is not an example of Reapportionment?
A. Rust Belt states losing representatives
B. Sunbelt states gaining representatives
C. Redistricting with equal representation
D. Gerrymandering without equal representation
E. Majority-Minority district with equal representation
C?
No.
http://www.ocvote.com/knowledgebase2/index.php?action=artikel&cat=25&id=493&artlang=en
To determine which option is not an example of reapportionment, we need to understand what reapportionment is. Reapportionment refers to the process of redistributing the number of seats in a legislative body, such as the House of Representatives in the United States, based on changes in population. It aims to ensure that each district or state has equal representation relative to their population size.
Option C suggests redistricting with equal representation, which could be seen as a form of reapportionment. However, it is important to note that reapportionment specifically deals with the redistribution of seats based on population changes, rather than the redrawing of district boundaries to achieve equal representation.
Options A and B both involve the shifting of seats and population between regions, which is typically the result of reapportionment. So these options could be examples of reapportionment.
Option D mentions gerrymandering without equal representation. Gerrymandering is the manipulation of district boundaries to gain an unfair advantage for a particular political party. While it often occurs during the redistricting process, it does not necessarily align with the concept of reapportionment, which focuses on fairness and equal representation.
Option E states a majority-minority district with equal representation. This can be seen as a result of reapportionment since it aims to provide representation to minority communities. It focuses on maintaining fair and proportional representation for minority groups in order to avoid diluting the voting power of racial or ethnic minorities.
Based on the explanations above, option C (redistricting with equal representation) does align with the concept of reapportionment and is not the correct answer to the question.