Login or Sign Up
Menu
Ask a New Question

16.)Which answer best describes the impact of the McCulloch vs. Maryland court case?

A.)The case proved that federal banks had to follow state laws.

B.)The case established the right for states to tax federal agencies.

C.)The case proved that the states cannot challenge the implied federal powers.***

D.)The case proved that state laws were more important than federal ones.

C?

Yes, the correct answer is C.) The case proved that the states cannot challenge the implied federal powers. To reach this answer, one must understand the significance of the McCulloch v. Maryland court case and the outcome of the case.

To find information about the case and its impact, you can start by searching for "McCulloch v. Maryland court case." This will provide you with relevant information about the case, such as the parties involved and the legal issues at stake.

Next, you can look for reputable sources, such as legal websites, textbooks, or scholarly articles, that discuss the impact of the McCulloch v. Maryland case on the relationship between state and federal powers. These sources will provide analysis and explanations to help you understand the implications of the court's decision.

In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the states cannot challenge the implied federal powers. This ruling established the principle of federal supremacy, meaning that federal laws and regulations take precedence over conflicting state laws. Therefore, option C is the answer that best describes the impact of the McCulloch v. Maryland court case.

Yes, the correct answer is C.) The case proved that the states cannot challenge the implied federal powers. The McCulloch v. Maryland court case, decided in 1819, was a landmark Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of federal power versus state power. It specifically addressed the question of whether the state of Maryland had the authority to tax a federally chartered bank. The Supreme Court, in its ruling, established the principle of implied powers, asserting that the federal government had certain implied powers not explicitly listed in the Constitution. Therefore, the case showed that the states cannot challenge the implied powers of the federal government.

Correct. C.