What were arguments for maintaining the slave trade and slavery in general during the Constitutional Debates on Slavery? How did the delegates from Georgia and South Carolina in particular impact the debate?
http://www.google.com/#q=constitutional+convention+debates+on+slavery+1787
During the Constitutional Debates on Slavery, there were several arguments put forth by those in favor of maintaining the slave trade and slavery in general. It is important to note that these arguments reflected the opinion of the delegates during that time and do not align with current societal values. Here are some of the main arguments:
1. Economic Argument: Proponents of slavery believed that slave labor was essential for the economy, particularly for the agrarian society of the Southern states. They argued that abolishing the slave trade or prohibiting slavery would lead to economic downfall, as it would drastically reduce the workforce and hinder plantation productivity.
2. Political Argument: Some delegates believed that maintaining slavery was crucial to the political balance of power between the North and the South. They feared that if slavery were to be abolished or restricted, it would diminish the Southern states' representation and influence in the political institutions such as Congress.
3. Racist and White Supremacy Argument: There were delegates who embraced racist ideologies and believed in the white supremacy concept. They argued that enslaved Africans and their descendants were inferior and believed that slavery was necessary to maintain social order and control over this perceived inferior population.
4. Social Argument: Supporters of slavery argued that it was a long-established institution deeply ingrained in Southern society. They claimed that abruptly abolishing slavery would disrupt social structures and lead to chaos.
Now, in regards to the impact of the delegates from Georgia and South Carolina:
The delegates from Georgia and South Carolina played a significant role in shaping the debate on slavery during the Constitutional Conventions. Both states were heavily dependent on the institution of slavery for their economies, which made their delegates staunch advocates for its preservation.
The delegates from these two states strongly defended the institution of slavery, arguing for its protection in the Constitution. They insisted that Congress should have limited power to regulate or restrict slavery, as they feared any interference could threaten their way of life and economic prosperity.
Furthermore, during the Constitutional Debates, these delegates placed immense pressure on their fellow delegates from the North, bargaining for concessions that would protect their state's interests regarding slavery. The result was the inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Clause, which required the return of escaped slaves to their owners.
Overall, the delegates from Georgia and South Carolina were influential in ensuring that slavery was protected to a certain extent during the Constitutional Debates, leaving a lasting impact on the institution throughout the early years of the United States.