an environment artist created a piece in protest of trash. Anticipation negative public reaction, the artist decided to display the work anyway. what is the most likely reason?

A. The artist believed that the purpose of the work was to stir up awareness

B. The artist did not want to waste all the time spend on the work

C. The artist was very brave

D.The artist did not care about public reaction••

Correct me if I'm wrong!!

I don't agree.

Wouldn't it be B??

It's A, The artist believed that the purpose of the work was to stir up awareness. It's not that hard to answer questions, you guys...

Based on the information provided, it is most likely that option A, "The artist believed that the purpose of the work was to stir up awareness," is the most likely reason why the artist decided to display the artwork despite anticipating negative public reaction. Here's why:

Creating a piece of art in protest of trash suggests that the artist wants to bring attention to the issue and create awareness. Displaying the artwork, even in the face of expected negative public reaction, would serve the purpose of starting a conversation and drawing attention to the problem of trash. It shows that the artist is committed to their cause and believes in the power of art to create awareness and change.

Option B, "The artist did not want to waste all the time spent on the work," can also be a possible factor, as artists invest a significant amount of time and effort into their creations. However, given the mention of the artist's anticipation of negative public reaction, it is more reasonable to assume that their primary motive was to create awareness rather than avoiding wasting time.

Option C, "The artist was very brave," might be a contributing factor, but bravery alone may not be the primary reason for displaying the work. While it takes courage to display controversial artwork, the key motivation here is likely the desire to raise awareness, not just bravery itself.

Option D, "The artist did not care about public reaction," seems less likely because the artist specifically anticipated negative public reaction. If the artist truly didn't care about public reaction, they might not have had any expectation or concern about displaying the work in the first place.

Therefore, based on the provided information, option A appears to be the most likely reason for the artist's decision to display the work despite anticipating negative public reaction.

No. Not B. I've checked two of your wrong answers. Now you're on your own.

@mrs.sue that's very rude your here to help 2 wrong answers or not