Describe some of the laws of war and how this is factored into the issue of terrorism.
My answer is killing of innocent civilians is prohibit.
I don't know of any laws of war that haven't been broken -- many times by many countries and rogue groups.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/lawwar.asp
Yes, killing of civilians is prohibited.
You are correct that the killing of innocent civilians is prohibited in the laws of war. This principle is known as the principle of distinction, which requires parties involved in a conflict to distinguish between combatants and civilians, and to direct their attacks only at legitimate military targets while taking all feasible precautions to minimize harm to civilians.
In addition to the principle of distinction, let me describe a few other important laws of war that are relevant to the issue of terrorism:
1. Prohibition on targeting non-combatants: This principle, similar to the principle of distinction, prohibits intentionally targeting civilians who are not taking part in the hostilities. This includes acts such as indiscriminate attacks, terrorist attacks, and hostage-taking.
2. Prohibition on using prohibited weapons: The laws of war prohibit the use of certain weapons that cause excessive harm or are indiscriminate, such as biological or chemical weapons, landmines, and cluster munitions.
3. Protection of prisoners of war: The laws of war also provide protections for captured combatants who are considered prisoners of war. They must be treated humanely, with provisions for basic needs such as food, shelter, medical care, and access to legal representation.
Now, let's discuss how these laws of war are factored into the issue of terrorism. Terrorism refers to the deliberate use of violence, often targeting civilians, to create fear and advance political, ideological, or religious objectives. The laws of war, while primarily concerned with state-to-state conflicts, also apply to non-state actors involved in armed conflicts, including terrorist organizations.
States have an obligation to prosecute individuals involved in acts of terrorism within their jurisdiction while still respecting the fundamental principles of the laws of war. This means they must adhere to the principle of distinction and take all feasible precautions to minimize civilian casualties even when combating terrorists.
However, it is important to note that terrorists often operate outside the boundaries of the laws of war, deliberately targeting civilians and disregarding the principles that protect non-combatants. This places states in a complex position as they strive to protect their citizens and uphold the rule of law at the same time.