Compare and contrast Samuel Pepys style in his diary entries and Jonathan Swift style Gulliver's travels. I need some help finding some things to compare and some things to contrast on both sides . Thanks
http://www.bookrags.com/studyguide-diarysamuelpepys/
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=literary+criticism+of+gullivers+&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4VRHB_enUS648US649&q=literary+analysis+of+gulliver%27s+travels+&gs_l=hp..1.0i22i30l2.0.0.4.258883...........0.U61gNThFsPc
To compare and contrast Samuel Pepys' style in his diary entries and Jonathan Swift's style in "Gulliver's Travels," you can consider various aspects of their writing. Here are some points to consider for each author:
Samuel Pepys (Diary Entries):
1. Subject Matter: Pepys' diary entries primarily focus on his personal life, including his daily activities, social encounters, and political events.
2. Tone and Voice: Pepys' writing style is often personal, informal, and conversational, capturing his thoughts and emotions in a straightforward manner.
3. Detail and Descriptions: Pepys provides intricate details in his diary entries, describing people, events, and even mundane occurrences with vividness and sensory imagery.
4. Realism: Pepys aims for authenticity, documenting his experiences and observations faithfully, without embellishment or fictional elements.
5. Language Use: Although Pepys' writing is predominantly straightforward, he occasionally incorporates elements of poetry, wordplay, and humor.
Jonathan Swift ("Gulliver's Travels"):
1. Genre and Storytelling: "Gulliver's Travels" is a fictional novel that combines satire, parody, and adventure. It follows the protagonist, Lemuel Gulliver, on his fantastical journeys to different lands populated by unusual creatures and societies.
2. Satire and Social Critique: Swift uses his witty and satirical style to criticize various aspects of society, such as politics, government, religion, and human nature.
3. Formality and Irony: Swift's writing style is more formal and objective, often utilizing ironic tones and understatement to convey his satirical intentions.
4. Allegory and Symbolism: Swift employs allegorical elements and symbolism throughout the novel to represent political and social situations, allowing readers to interpret deeper meanings.
5. Radically different worlds: "Gulliver's Travels" explores four distinct societies, each with its own structure, beliefs, and flaws, highlighting the cultural diversity and human fallibility.
To compare and contrast these styles, consider the following points:
- While both authors display a keen observation of society, Pepys focuses on real-life events and individuals, whereas Swift uses fictional settings to convey his criticism.
- Pepys' style emphasizes personal experiences and emotions in his diary entries, while Swift's style relies more on satire and social commentary.
- Pepys' language is more informal and conversational, reflecting his personal thoughts, while Swift's writing tends to be more formal and objective, implementing irony and allegory.
- Pepys' diary entries are based on his own life, while Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" constructs imaginative scenarios to explore societal flaws.
To find specific examples to support these points, you can examine selected diary entries of Samuel Pepys and specific sections or chapters from "Gulliver's Travels" and analyze how their styles and themes align or differ.
Certainly! Let's compare and contrast the writing styles of Samuel Pepys in his diary entries and Jonathan Swift in Gulliver's Travels:
1. Narrative Structure:
- Pepys: His diary entries follow a chronological structure, recording events and personal experiences in a diary format.
- Swift: Gulliver's Travels is structured as a fictional narrative with four separate voyages and a frame narrative, blending elements of adventure, satire, and political commentary.
2. Language and Tone:
- Pepys: Pepys' style is personal and conversational, reflecting his immediate thoughts and emotions. He uses colloquial language and vivid descriptions that capture his experiences.
- Swift: Swift's writing style is more formal and satirical. He employs irony, sarcasm, and humor to satirize various aspects of society, politics, and human behaviors.
3. Purpose and Themes:
- Pepys: Pepys' diary serves as a personal record of his daily life, encompassing both significant historical events (such as the Great Fire of London) and everyday experiences. The diary primarily focuses on his personal concerns, relationships, and observations.
- Swift: Gulliver's Travels is a satirical work aimed at critiquing human nature, society, government, and various institutions. Swift employs allegory and fantastical elements to convey his critiques and explore themes such as colonialism, human follies, and moral degradation.
4. Perspective and Voice:
- Pepys: Pepys writes from a first-person perspective, providing intimate insights into his own life and experiences. He often expresses his thoughts, desires, and reactions to events.
- Swift: In Gulliver's Travels, Swift uses the voice of an omniscient narrator and provides different perspectives through the protagonist, Lemuel Gulliver. Each voyage explores different societies, highlighting their flaws and the fallibility of human beings.
5. Realism vs. Fantasy:
- Pepys: Pepys' diary entries represent reality, providing a realistic account of his daily life and experiences during the 17th century. The events he records are based on his actual observations.
- Swift: Gulliver's Travels is a work of fiction with fantastical elements. The narrative takes Gulliver to remote lands with absurd and exaggerated characteristics, emphasizing the satirical nature of the story.
By comparing and contrasting these aspects, you can gain a better understanding of how Pepys and Swift differed in their writing styles and the purposes behind their respective works.